#5 may be pushing the limits, but it's a concert. Not so much a person.
The site is still very unstyled. It's fourth or seventh in line of site
priorities right now. Perhaps next year.
--
Paul Kruczynski /
http://kruczyn.ski/
Bradley Gannon wrote on 12/18/19 7:34 AM:
> Dear ~club:
>
> I don't have any sense of how much you all participated in last week's
> workshop, since I couldn't think of a neat little command to run to scan
> /home/ for wikis. As far as I can tell, there wasn't much interest, so
> perhaps I'll try to a different sort of prompt this week.
>
> Do you remember MySpace? Me neither. I happen to be young enough to have
> more or less missed the rise of MySpace and instead been tempted by
> somewhat early Facebook circa 2007. (That's another story.)
>
> Based on echos in preserved popular culture from the period and other
> forms of archaeology, I have concluded that there was once a way for
> MySpace users to define an in-group on their page known as the Top 8.
> Apparently, the decisions surrounding who was in a person's Top 8 and
> who wasn't were serious ones with long-lasting social consequences, at
> least for some. Of course, this is a ridiculous idea to us evolved
> humans of the almost 2020s. We would never be dragged down into
> arguments with strangers on the Internet over essentially meaningless
> tribal drivel, right? ...right?
>
> ~club, your task this week is to recreate MySpace's Top 8 somewhere on
> your own set of pages. Just one catch: no people. To try to avoid
> recreating the apparent angst that comes with publicly defining
> in-groups and out-groups, let's pick instead from the vast selection of
> topics, languages (natural and artificial), technologies, forms and
> genres of music, and other inanimate stuff of interest. This way, we
> might avoid the toxicity and end up sharing our interests with each
> other instead.
>
> Have fun, ~club, and I'm sorry this one was a little late.
>
> Bradley
>